|
7 WOMEN (1966, Directed by John Ford)
When Orson Welles was asked who his favourite directors were, he responded
‘the American Masters, by whom I mean John Ford, John Ford and John Ford.’
Welles’ reverence and the fact that Ford won six directing Oscars (more than any
other director) would indicate that he was one of the world’s great film
directors. He is certainly my favourite.
7 WOMEN was John Ford’s last feature film (he went on to do two more
documentaries).
I have been trying to find it on video for ages. It used to be available on
Laser Disc (whatever happened to that?) but up until now, it has not been
available on video. I purchased my copy from Cinema Classics in New York. 7
WOMEN is on the Hellfire Video label, which I think is suspect, because their
products are obviously dubs, probably from an overseas release. Still, I’m glad
to own this fine John Ford film in my collection.
John Martin Feeney was John Ford’s real name. He took the name John Ford from
an obscure Elizabethan playwright of the same name. I would suggest that this is
a perfect metaphor for John Ford the filmmaker.
John Ford was one of the most literate, intelligent filmmakers ever. He
innovated many shots and styles of story telling that, because they’ve inspired
so much imitation, have since become clichés. He was a poet, a visionary and he
was unafraid to tackle themes of nobility, courage and masculine friendship. Yet
he hid behind his poet’s soul with a gruff exterior and a sometimes off-putting
irascibility that cost him friendships and even family members. It is as if his
‘stage name’ were a mask that he wore on set and off, perhaps afraid to reveal
his true self to anyone, including himself.
7 WOMEN is not John Ford’s best film, bus despite the unflattering criticism
I have read about it over the years, it is not a bad film. It does seem dated
(for one thing it is totally studio bound), and even though it is set in 1935
China, it still plays like a Western in many ways. Some of the casting is
questionable (Mike Mazurki and Woody Strode as Chinese warlords?—they look more
like Cossacks left over from TARAS BULBA) and there are moments when one might
be inclined to believe Ford and the rest of the people involved in the film were
racists. (When Anne Bancroft, playing a gruff doctor summons a Chinese coolie,
she yells: ‘Come here Chang, or whatever your name is!’) However, it is very
easy to look back to an earlier era and make judgments. For example, John Ford
was most definitely not a racist, rather he was working within a given story
structure at a certain time (the 1960s) that was portraying a less enlightened
period of history (the 1930s).
Having said all that, there is still more in this film that is commendable
than not. I would rather watch anything by John Ford than most of what is
produced today. And not just for sheer entertainment value. Ford’s themes are
always interesting. The most striking aspect of 7 WOMEN is that it is about
women. Ford, who is arguably best known today for his frequent collaborations
with John Wayne (giving us many, many great films), is not the first director
you would think of as a ‘woman’s director’. George Cukor, on the other hand, had
that reputation. Yet Ford was the ideal director for 7 WOMEN because he was in
essence taking a very masculine storyline (courage, daring, sacrifice under
extreme and dangerous circumstances) and exploring how his female characters
would react.
Anne Bancroft is the top-billed star of this film. She plays a John Ford
stock character of sorts, the hard-drinking, caustic doctor whose observations
on life and his/her immediate surroundings often cuts through anything
artificial to reveal the core issues at stake. (Edmond O’Brien in THE MAN WHO
SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE is another example of this ‘type’). Bancroft is such a good
actress that she makes this character believable. Appearing at an isolated
mission in China which is run by several (mostly female) Christian missionaries,
Bancroft surprises everyone by simply not being a man. A male doctor was
expected. A female doctor is much more interesting in this particular mix of
characters.
Margaret Leighton, a magnificent stage actress, plays the head of the
mission. Her performance is a bit over-played for my tastes, revealing her
theatrical background. Nonetheless she is good in a very unsympathetic part. She
runs the mission as if it were a prison. Her stern demeanor betrays her own
uptightness and extreme unhappiness. She is also strongly suggested to be a
lesbian, with an invested interest in young Sue Lyon, one of the mission’s
workers.
At first I thought that perhaps Ford was laying on the ‘Christian as
hypocrite’ theme a bit too strongly. But then I came to realize that his point
was not to malign Christianity (Ford was a lapsed Catholic, but he did have deep
respect for the Catholic Church, considering it the anchor of spiritual and
moral authority). Rather Ford’s viewpoint was to depict the genuine virtues
embodied in Christ (sacrifice, compassion, etc.) portrayed by an Atheist
(Bancroft’s character). This is not unreasonable. Jesus Himself pointed out the
difference between the Pharisees who made a public show of their faith and those
who quietly went about practically living their faith. While Bancroft’s
character is not motivated by her own active faith, she is compelled by virtues
that are clearly personified in Christianity. Her ultimate act of self-sacrifice
so that the others can live exemplifies this theme.
I’m deliberately not telling you the outline of the story because I don’t
think reviews should waste time telling you what you are going to see. Reviews
should be more concerned with what to look for within the film.
In fact, the story, were I to concern myself with a summary, is nothing
special. The point of the piece is that it is a character study, told from the
fairly unique perspective of the 7 women, rather than a more conventional story
featuring men. There is no romantic love story, but there is a greater love
story—that of sacrificing for one’s fellow woman.
Interestingly, the lesbian aspect of the story is not belaboured. It is
simply another characteristic of Margaret Leighton’s missionary. It is clearly
shown to be a negative characteristic, which is as it should be, given that she
is a professed Christian missionary, but Ford does not distinguish this
characteristic from any other. He simply shows that the head of the mission,
professing to ‘minister with the Gospel’ is a hypocrite. Without going into the
pros and cons of ‘political correctness’, it is not ‘homophobic’ to disagree
with something or even to pronounce the belief that it is wrong. (It becomes
‘homophobia’ when there is an active hatred involved). Ford is such a
good director, and Margaret Leighton such a fine actress that if anything, we
are sympathetic to the missionary’s distress and inner turmoil. Dr. Bancroft
allows her and the other characters to see themselves as if for the first time,
as if she (Bancroft) were a strange kind of soul-piercing mirror.
How people react under stress (extraordinary circumstances) has long been a
favourite theme of Hollywood directors. Howard Hawks explored similar territory
in some of his greatest films. The twist here is that women are examined;
what’s more, examined by a great director normally associated with
masculine stories. How many times had that been done in 1966?
Additionally, the ending (which initially seemed to me rather abrupt) is
atypical of Hollywood films. There is an appropriate mixture of happiness for
the survival of six of the women (including Leighton, who presumably, like the
others, has learned from Bancroft’s sacrifice) and trepidation for Bancroft’s
impending fate. (Don’t worry, I haven’t given it away—the circumstances are
what’s important here).
If you are an appreciator of John Ford, then I strongly recommend 7 WOMEN.
This tape is in Widescreen format and includes the theatrical trailer and a
‘making of’ documentary. The folks at Cinema Classics are very friendly and have
a number of titles not otherwise accessible. Contact them for a catalogue or
visit them online at www.cinemaclassics.com.
Anything by John Ford is a poignant reminder that they don’t make them like
they used to! Now let’s see the rest of Ford’s sound films brought out on
video!
Jon Ted Wynne
|