Fan Us On FacebookFollow Our Tweets on Twitter

PDF Print E-mail

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Featured Hot

 

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Movie Review

The Magic Is Gone...

"Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" is not a bad movie, but it is far, far from being a good one. Running an obscene 2 1/2 hours, presenting a story which could have made a halfway decent half-hour episode of a half-assed TV series, this "Potter" has no focus, a comprehensive plot, any semblance of cohesion, purpose, meaning.

Given this view of David Yates' work (a director without much to his credit beyond the BBC Trollope miniseries "The Way We Live Now," and of "Potter" No. 5, but entrusted with both parts of the concluding "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows"), how is it possible to say that it's "not a bad movie"?
The reason is great cinematography (by Bruno Delbonnel), excellent special effects, a sterling class, headed by such outstanding stars of the London stage as Michael Gambon (Dumbledore), Jim Broadbent (Prof. Slughorn), Alan Rickman (Severus Snape), Timothy Spall (Wormtail) - in addition to the fine "Potter" regulars: Daniel Radcliffe (Harry), Emma Watson (Hermione), Rupert Grint (Ron Wesley), and some new characters. Helena Bonham Carter has her usual ridiculously overblown turn as Bellatrix Lestrange.

So, given all these assets, good things happen - for a few minutes here, a few lines there. At the beginning, the leisurely pace even creates an atmosphere of "literariness," creates hope for something intelligent. But pretty much everything goes up in smoke as an endless thread of side-stories, diversions, non-sequiturs use up two hours of the film.

Half soap, half sitcom, half "let's see how we can waste some more time," I had half a mind every 15 minutes to leave "Half-Blood Prince," and the fact that I stuck it out doesn't speak well of my judgment.

The central story - if you can find it - is trite and uninteresting. So much so that if I revealed the identity of mysterious prince in the title, it wouldn't make the least bit of difference.

The vast majority of the plot is described well by the unintentionally mind-numbing IMDB synopsis. Just try to follow this and imagine sitting through 153 minutes of it:

"Harry and his friends go through daily life, busy with school work, Quidditch (in which Harry has been made captain of the team), and, of course, romance. Ron has found a new girlfriend, Lavender Brown, a perky (if not obnoxious) Gryffindor student, and Hermione is not happy about it. Ron and Hermione's friendship takes a toll throughout the school year and Harry, as usual, is stuck in the middle. Harry, meanwhile, is facing a romantic dilemma of his own: he realizes he is falling for his best friend's sister, Ginny Weasley, who is unfortunately dating Harry's classmate, Dean Thomas. Harry's pining for Ginny and Ron's hilarious relationship with Lavender give this story a large dose of reality."

A large dose of *whose* reality?!

About The Author: Janos Gereben, a San Francisco film critic, is an editor and journalist who also writes about art, classical music, travel and technology.

Info

Directed By David Yates
Actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Michael Gambon, Jim Broadbent, Alan Rickman
Genre Action / Adventure
Box Office $273,800,000 as of Aug. 9, 2009
Run Time 2:33
MPAA Rating PG
Release Date 07-15-09
Studio Warner Bros. Pictures
IMDB http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0417741/
DVD Release Date December 08, 2009

Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince Movie Review & Synopsis

Though HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN director Alfonso Cuaron still holds the crown for best film in the series, David Yates is making an attempt at a coup with HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE. Dark, gleefully funny, and beautifully shot, this adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s novel should please fans despite numerous changes to the 650-page source material. In this sixth film in the series, Harry’s (Daniel Radcliffe) inevitable confrontation with the dark wizard Voldemort grows closer, and Hogwarts headmaster Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) wants the young student to be prepared. He guides Harry through a memory of a young Voldemort, but an important moment is missing. Harry must extract this memory from the new Hogwarts teacher, Horace Slughorn (a perfectly slimy Jim Broadbent), who is as eager for fame as he is reluctant to revisit this painful moment.

Meanwhile, romance rules the school of witches and wizards, with Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) refusing to admit their feelings for each other. Harry also harbors a secret love of his own: Ron’s younger sister, Ginny (Bonnie Wright). But despite his crush, Harry keeps an eye on Snape (Alan Rickman) and Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton), who may be responsible for attacks on the school. HALF-BLOOD PRINCE deftly balances the humor of Hogwarts heartbreak and the thrills of dark villains attacking the school.

The cast is as talented as ever, and the youngest members--Radcliffe, Grint, and Watson--have developed their talent well. However, this film is most remarkable for its fine cinematography from AMELIE director of photography Bruno Delbonnel. Using a muted palette, Delbonnel makes Hogwarts look hauntingly beautiful in a way that fans have never seen. There’s always plenty of fun and adventure in the series, but this entry boasts impressive visuals as well.

 

EI Indexed Review(s)

Editor reviews


 

The Magic Is Gone...

Rating:
 
2.5

"Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" is not a bad movie, but it is far, far from being a good one. Running an obscene 2 1/2 hours, presenting a story which could have made a halfway decent half-hour episode of a half-assed TV series, this "Potter" has no focus, a comprehensive plot, any semblance of cohesion, purpose, meaning.

User Review

Full Review
Comments (0)
Janos Gereben Reviewed by Janos Gereben
December 05, 2009
Top 50 Reviewer
View all my reviews
Report this review
 
Last updated: December 05, 2009

The Magic Is Gone...

Rating:
 
2.5
Comments (0)
 


User reviews

Average user rating from: 2 user(s)

Rating:
 
3.0   (2)
 
Ratings (the higher the better)
Rating
Comments
 
Rating:
 
3.0

User Review

User Reviews Harry Potter and the Half Blooded Prince was not a bad movie. However, the director paid little attention to the book causing many changes made in the movie. While watching it, I relized a couple things could have been improved and if you havent seen the movie I would recommend it only to those who havent read the books.
Comments (0)

One of the best HP movies

Rating:
 
3.0

User Review

User Reviews Although it was really, really long I enjoyed this movie better than some of the earlier HP movies. I thought was put together better and that it flowed better. It might have seemed like it had a lot of side stories to somebody that hasn't read the book, but all the major parts were covered. The book is so long, its probably hard to put all the different important things in there without it seeming a little choppy.
Comments (0)
 
There are no movie trailers available for this listing at this time.
Please check back soon as we update movie trailers daily.
 
From the EI Community
Micmacs
User rating
 
4.0
Reviewed by Hillary
The Sorcerer's Apprentice (2010)
User rating
 
3.0
Reviewed by kxic
"Fun sci-fi fantasy flick, very entertaining"
New on DVD