|
Youth is fleeting
by Jonathan W. Hickman

Ed finds a use for a fishing pole.
|
It is not easy to survive on the streets, it's hard work, hardly worth it really. "Raw
Non-Fiction" is the reality of "Trainspotting" in America and particularly
the streets San Francisco. In the age of the mockumentary, "Raw" gives us
something tangible.
THE STORY:
In San Francisco, documentary filmmakers Luben Omaiski and Hans
Fritz follow around several troubled youths--scavengers of the underbelly
in a place called "The Tenderloin." The people they follow (for it seems
like a few weeks or, at least, several days) are not actors in the
conventional or classical sense of the word, rather, they purport to be
real people, and, in places, it appears they do real things. The narration
is expertly crafted allegedly by Bulgarian born Omaiski shown to the
audience silent movie style (note: this one's a talky with a cool
soundtrack of mixes). It is a "Canterbury's Tale" of sorts, various
sections of the film are devoted to the daily life of the young street
dwellers as we learn about their origins and they belt out their
philosophies. Beware the unrated nature of "Raw" for it is truly a raw
depiction of drug use, mental illness and its untreated consequences left
to roam the streets of the Tenderloin and beyond.

Maz and Ed count their loot and devise a plan.
|
THE REVIEW:
One's immediate reaction to "Raw" may be disgust with a quick
inclination to walk out. The young people in the film are not immediately
interesting and maybe they are not intended to be. In time, if one gives
the film time, the camera disappears and reality sets in; the characters
become more tightly drawn and interest builds. "Raw" is ultimately a
documentary about the finer points in life--not every young person grows
old and some never want to.
Three characters take center stage--Dick (who calls himself "The
Emperor"), Ed (who is a fisher of men and has it all figured out), and
Jason (whose mental problems are compounded by his youth). There are other
lesser characters such as Pirate who rants and raves uncontrollably in a
drunken and/or drugged state, the youthful damaged Katie, and Maz who like
Ed may be the most intelligent and likeable character of the bunch.

Dick in the Daytime
|
After watching "Raw," I had a discussion with Rusty White of einsiders.com
about movies of the 1970s. It was observed that the 1970s, particularly
the early 1970s, produced some of the most sophisticated and best small
films ever made. There was a focus in the 70s on the small picture,
perhaps, what is talked about in the Presidential debates as "domestic
policy." Often, the grainy images from these films delivered powerful
messages resonating with the everyman. "Raw's" images and subject matter
harkens back to the greatness of small 1970s films like "Panic in Needle
Park." What is scary about "Raw" is that the characters appear to be real,
Pacino (certainly not an actor in "Raw," but who starred in the great Video
Risk "Panic") is not delivering the lines here nor faking the injection of
illegal substances through dirty needles into his arm and neck.

Dick in the Nighttime
|
I felt bad for Jason. He was in need of medication and counseling. I
liked Ed, who had a survival system that appeared to be working. I was
disgusted by Dick who had an inflated opinion of himself and did not seem
to be long for this world.
This week in Atlanta, Georgia, on the campus Emory University, a racist
and controversial editorial was published in the school newspaper. The
editorial made a bigoted comment about African Americans by stating that
its claims of white superiority could be proven scientifically. A forum

Jason makes a desparate call for help
|
was commenced immediately and attended by hundreds of students, there was
news coverage, intelligent students of various races were shown making
intelligent comments about the ignorance of the editorial. No one liked
what was written, but everyone read it and everyone talked about it. Could
that have been its purpose?
If given time, "Raw" can evoke some strong emotions, and maybe you will
not like the film. Even if you don't like "Raw," it will give you
something to think about. Although I do not have children, yet, the film
made me want to more carefully raise the children I do, hopefully, end up
having. It is a dangerous world out there and one unkind to youth that
fades like a cut rose.
Visit the Raw Non-Fiction website
Jonathan W. Hickman, 2000
|